Examination of project feasibility analysis method

Sutdhinon Wiroonrath

dc.contributor.author	Sutdhinon Wiroonrath
dc.contributor.other	Burapha University. Graduate School of Commerce
dc.date.accessioned	2021-07-04T08:47:29Z
dc.date.available	2021-07-04T08:47:29Z
dc.date.issued	2020
dc.identifier.uri	http://dspace.lib.buu.ac.th/xmlui/handle/1234567890/4278
dc.language.iso	en	th_TH
dc.publisher	Graduate School of Commerce, Burapha University	en
dc.subject	Project management	en
dc.subject	Management	en
dc.title	Examination of project feasibility analysis method	en
dc.type	Article	th_TH
dc.issue	1	th_TH
dc.volume	22	th_TH
dc.year	2020	th_TH
dc.description.abstractalternative	This study aims to Examine the method and process of project analysis for meeting the management or budget provider’s needs, expected benefit is that a guideline for project analysis can be made for the Graduate School of Commerce. Research method is an interview of 10 experts in project writing and budget approval (Morse, 1994). The experts are selected by purposive sampling, and result from the interview is compared with two research works from the Graduate School of Commerce. Result from this work is that for a project to be authorized for execution and granted budget, it would need following things: name conforming to government policy, rationale matching government policy, objective conforming to the budget agency, work scope concurring with the value chain, clear work process and duration within the limit imposed by the employer, respectable and experienced project manager who is also well-connected, and budget reasonable for the objective. The project executor must also be able to carry out the project, has a representative and coordinator to explain importance and rationale to the budget authorizer. Some parts of the process can be skipped, or executed first as long as conformance to the budget provider’s criteria is maintained. Expected benefits and suggests are discovered in this study: 10 project analysis guides.	en
dc.journal	Journal of global business review	th_TH
dc.page	49-59	th_TH